> From: Patrick Robb <pr...@iol.unh.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 8:21 PM
> To: Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Aditya Ambadipudi <aditya.ambadip...@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Jack
> Min <jack...@nvidia.com>; step...@networkplumber.org; Matan Azrad
> <ma...@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>;
> roret...@linux.microsoft.com; konstantin.anan...@huawei.com;
> hof...@lysator.liu.se; wathsala.vithan...@arm.com;
> dhruv.tripa...@arm.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; n...@arm.com;
> Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] deque: add multi-thread unsafe double ended
> queue
> 
> Hi Ali,
> 
> Wathsala reached out asking how the checkpatch CI check can be updated so
> that this series passes checkpatch.
> 
> If building the dictionary is a 1 time operation for you, you may have to 
> apply
> this patch and re-run devtools/build-dict.sh so that the new dictionary is in
> place for a V3 of this series.
> 
> It looks like these dictionary exceptions are submitted quite rarely. But, if 
> it
> becomes more common in the future you could look at adding a step to your
> automation which produces a new dictionary every time you run checkpatch,
> based on any additions to the exception list which came with the patch. But
> it's probably not worth the effort with the low volume of word exception
> additions.
> 

Hello,

Applied the change to the dictionary and reran the check.
Still failing because of the GERRIT CHANGE_ID though:
https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2024-April/650688.html

Regards,
Ali

Reply via email to