> From: Patrick Robb <pr...@iol.unh.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2024 8:21 PM > To: Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com> > Cc: Aditya Ambadipudi <aditya.ambadip...@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Jack > Min <jack...@nvidia.com>; step...@networkplumber.org; Matan Azrad > <ma...@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>; > roret...@linux.microsoft.com; konstantin.anan...@huawei.com; > hof...@lysator.liu.se; wathsala.vithan...@arm.com; > dhruv.tripa...@arm.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com; n...@arm.com; > Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] deque: add multi-thread unsafe double ended > queue > > Hi Ali, > > Wathsala reached out asking how the checkpatch CI check can be updated so > that this series passes checkpatch. > > If building the dictionary is a 1 time operation for you, you may have to > apply > this patch and re-run devtools/build-dict.sh so that the new dictionary is in > place for a V3 of this series. > > It looks like these dictionary exceptions are submitted quite rarely. But, if > it > becomes more common in the future you could look at adding a step to your > automation which produces a new dictionary every time you run checkpatch, > based on any additions to the exception list which came with the patch. But > it's probably not worth the effort with the low volume of word exception > additions. >
Hello, Applied the change to the dictionary and reran the check. Still failing because of the GERRIT CHANGE_ID though: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2024-April/650688.html Regards, Ali