Thanks, Stephen, for the comment. Unfortunately, we don't have the dev setup nor the resources to test out this change using MSVC.
Thank you, Aditya Ambadipudi ________________________________ From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 1, 2024 9:05 AM To: Aditya Ambadipudi <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Honnappa Nagarahalli <[email protected]>; Dhruv Tripathi <[email protected]>; Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; nd <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] deque: add multithread unsafe deque library On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 20:37:27 -0500 Aditya Ambadipudi <[email protected]> wrote: > As previously discussed in the mailing list [1] we are sending out this > patch that provides the implementation and unit test cases for the > RTE_DEQUE library. This includes functions for creating a RTE_DEQUE > object. Allocating memory to it. Deleting that object and free'ing the > memory associated with it. Enqueue/Dequeue functions. Functions for > zero-copy API. > > [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-August/275003.html Does this build without errors with the Microsoft Visual C compiler? Want to make sure that all new code does not create more work for the Windows maintainers.
