On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 22:55:34 +0800 "J.J. Martzki" <mars14...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've read the libbpf code again and I found some other functions with > pure 'bpf_' prefix. Should we rename all the functions whose names > start with pure 'bpf_'? Yes, all visible (ie non-static) functions should use a DPDK style prefix.
