Ok, that was my mistake. I’ll send the new patch later :) Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 14, 2023, at 01:22, Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org> > wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:07:29 +0000 > Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@huawei.com> wrote: > >>> I've read the libbpf code again and I found some other functions with >>> pure 'bpf_' prefix. Should we rename all the functions whose names >>> start with pure 'bpf_'? >> >> I thought you already prefixed all non-static functions in the lib... >> Or do I miss something? > > Right, it was bpf_validate, bpf_jit_XXX that were not prefixed. > > .../build/lib/librte_bpf.a.p $ nm * | grep ' T ' | grep -v 'rte_bpf' > 0000000000000070 T bpf_jit > 0000000000003210 T bpf_jit_x86 > 00000000000021f0 T bpf_validate
