> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@amd.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 12:00 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <step...@networkplumber.org>; Jangra, Yogesh <yogesh.jan...@intel.com>;
> Singh, Aman Deep <aman.deep.si...@intel.com>; Zhang, Yuying
> <yuying.zh...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; R, Kamalakannan <kamalakanna...@intel.com>; Suresh
> Narayane, Harshad <harshad.suresh.naray...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix closing softnic port before ethdev ports
>
> On 3/9/2023 5:19 PM, Dumitrescu, Cristian wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> >> Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 4:31 PM
> >> To: Jangra, Yogesh <yogesh.jan...@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitre...@intel.com>; R,
> >> Kamalakannan <kamalakanna...@intel.com>; Suresh Narayane, Harshad
> >> <harshad.suresh.naray...@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix closing softnic port before ethdev
> ports
> >>
> >> On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 14:42:49 +0000
> >> Yogesh Jangra <yogesh.jan...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * SoftNIC runs on the sevice core, it uses the resources from
> >>> + * the testpmd application. When we run quit command, the
> >> testpmd
> >>> + * application stops ethdev ports first, SoftNIC will try to
> >>> + * access the port and sometimes that result in segmentation
> >>> + * error. So first closing the SoftNIC port.
> >>> + */
> >>> + RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(pt_id) {
> >>> + if (!strcmp(ports[pt_id].dev_info.driver_name,
> >> "net_softnic")) {
> >>> + stop_port(pt_id);
> >>> + close_port(pt_id);
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>
> >> NAK
> >> No driver specific hacks please.
> >>
> >> Instead fix the driver design or bug please.
> >
> > Hi Stephen,
> >
> > This is not a Soft NIC driver-specific hack, this is required for working
> > around
> some of the ethdev drivers that don't implement the stop() API correctly and
> free up the device queues or some other internal resources on stop() instead
> of
> close().
> >
>
> Why not fix the misbehaving drivers, instead of working around for
> softnic, as Stephen suggested?
>
> Is there a list of problematic drivers?
>
Ferruh, I think this is not a reasonable request. We don't have the expertise
to fix all drivers, not the hardware to test all drivers.
> > The Soft NIC is a meta-device that sits on top of other "physical" ethdev
> devices, so when the Soft NIC device continues to poll the queues of those
> physical devices after their queues have been freed, the Soft NIC will get a
> segfault. This fix is required to protect against this sort of incorrect
> driver
> behavior by simply stopping the Soft NIC devices first.
> >
> > We already have several driver specific branches in the test-pmd for e.g.
> > LAG
> or virtual devices; IMO this small change falls in the same category and it
> should
> get accepted.
> >
> > Please let us know if this makes sense to you?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cristian
