> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net] > Sent: Monday, 6 March 2023 17.13 > > The impact of the option "enable_iova_as_pa" is explained for users. > > Also the code flag "RTE_IOVA_AS_PA" is renamed as "RTE_IOVA_IN_MBUF" > in order to be more accurate (IOVA mode is decided at runtime), > and more readable in the code. > > Similarly the drivers are using the variable "require_iova_in_mbuf" > instead of "pmd_supports_disable_iova_as_pa" with an opposite meaning. > By default, it is assumed that drivers require the IOVA field in mbuf. > The drivers which support removing this field have to declare > themselves. > > If the option "enable_iova_as_pa" is disabled, the unsupported drivers > will be listed with the new reason text "requires IOVA in mbuf". > > Suggested-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > ---
Good clean-up. Acked-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
