>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>On 2/23/2023 12:30 PM, Ankur Dwivedi wrote:
>> The speed_fec_capa pointer can be null. So dereferencing the pointer
>> is removed and only the pointer is captured in trace function.
>> Fixed few more trace functions in which null pointer can be dereferenced.
>>
>> Coverity issue: 383238
>> Bugzilla ID: 1162
>> Fixes: 6679cf21d608 ("ethdev: add trace points")
>> Fixes: ed04fd4072e9 ("ethdev: add trace points for flow")
>>
>
>In below changes, pointers can be NULL at runtime, so agree on to the change,
>with minor comments please see below.
>
>
>But I don't think this is a fix for Bug 1162, which is an ASan reported error,
>can
>you please drop that tag unless it is verified.
The asan error reported in 1162 was because of capturing
rte_trace_point_emit_string(parent->bus_info); in
rte_eth_trace_find_next_of. I could not find the exact reason for the asan
error with parent->bus_info.
But I think parent pointer can be NULL in rte_eth_find_next_of, so I removed
the pointer reference. This resolved the asan error in 1162 as a side effect.
- rte_trace_point_emit_string(parent->name);
- rte_trace_point_emit_string(parent->bus_info);
- rte_trace_point_emit_int(parent->numa_node);
+ rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(parent);
I will check if I can add an if condition to check if a pointer is NULL inside
the trace function. If that works I will update this patch.
>
><...>
>
>> @@ -2308,8 +2300,7 @@ RTE_TRACE_POINT_FP(
>> int ret),
>> rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_id);
>> rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(flow);
>> - rte_trace_point_emit_int(action->type);
>> - rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(action->conf);
>> + rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(action);
>> rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(data);
>> rte_trace_point_emit_int(ret);
>
>I think 'rte_flow_trace_create()' is missed, rest looks OK.
>
>Can you please double check 'rte_flow_trace_create()' too?
Yes. Will add rte_flow_trace_create.
>
>> )
>> @@ -2349,14 +2340,8 @@ RTE_TRACE_POINT_FP(
>> const struct rte_flow_indir_action_conf *conf,
>> const struct rte_flow_action *action,
>> const struct rte_flow_action_handle *handle),
>> - uint8_t ingress = conf->ingress;
>> - uint8_t egress = conf->egress;
>> - uint8_t transfer = conf->transfer;
>> -
>> rte_trace_point_emit_u16(port_id);
>> - rte_trace_point_emit_u8(ingress);
>> - rte_trace_point_emit_u8(egress);
>> - rte_trace_point_emit_u8(transfer);
>> + rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(conf);
>> rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(action);
>> rte_trace_point_emit_ptr(handle);
>> )
>
>This change is different than others, this is removing bitfield related local
>variable assignment.
>
>According to bug 1167 that is causing a crash. So we need a separate patch to
>either remove or fix bitfield related issues, for now I am OK to remove (as
>done above).
>
>But can you please make another patch for bitfield issue and move above
>change to that patch?
Yes, will move this change to fix bitfield patch.
>
>Thanks,
>ferruh
