On 1/17/23 17:50, Hernan Vargas wrote:
Extend bbdev-test for soft output check, notably due to the logic in

test-bbdev

bbdev-test to enable termination changing.

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
---
  app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index 3b2578baf6..1d18d9e054 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -1348,6 +1348,7 @@ fill_queue_buffers(struct test_op_params *op_params,
                                RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_LLR_COMPRESSION;
                bool harq_comp = op_params->ref_dec_op->ldpc_dec.op_flags &
                                RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HARQ_6BIT_COMPRESSION;
+
                ldpc_llr_decimals = capabilities->cap.ldpc_dec.llr_decimals;
                ldpc_llr_size = capabilities->cap.ldpc_dec.llr_size;
                ldpc_cap_flags = capabilities->cap.ldpc_dec.capability_flags;
@@ -2425,7 +2426,7 @@ validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const 
uint16_t n,
                                        i);
if (ref_op->ldpc_dec.op_flags & RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_SOFT_OUT_ENABLE)
-                       TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(validate_op_chain(soft_output,
+                       TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(validate_op_so_chain(soft_output,
                                        soft_data_orig),
                                        "Soft output buffers (CB=%u) are not 
equal",
                                        i);
@@ -2495,7 +2496,6 @@ validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op **ops, const 
uint16_t n,
        return TEST_SUCCESS;
  }
-
  static inline int
  validate_op_fft_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op, struct op_data_entries 
*orig_op)
  {
@@ -3185,11 +3185,11 @@ throughput_intr_lcore_ldpc_dec(void *arg)
        for (j = 0; j < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++j) {
                for (i = 0; i < num_to_process; ++i) {
                        if (!loopback)
-                               rte_pktmbuf_reset(
-                                       ops[i]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data);
+                               
rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data);

This is not introduced by this patch, but I wonder why not using
mbuf_reset() or rte_pktmbuf_reset() everywhere?

Looking at the changes below, it seems mbuf_reset() is used for the
!loopback case.

                        if (hc_out || loopback)
-                               mbuf_reset(
-                               ops[i]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data);
+                               
mbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data);
+                       if (ops[i]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data != NULL)
+                               
rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data);
                }
tp->start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
@@ -3284,7 +3284,6 @@ throughput_intr_lcore_dec(void *arg)
                                
rte_pktmbuf_reset(ops[i]->turbo_dec.soft_output.data);
                }
-
                tp->start_time = rte_rdtsc_precise();
                for (enqueued = 0; enqueued < num_to_process;) {
                        num_to_enq = burst_sz;
@@ -3746,10 +3745,11 @@ bler_pmd_lcore_ldpc_dec(void *arg)
        for (i = 0; i < 1; ++i) { /* Could add more iterations */
                for (j = 0; j < num_ops; ++j) {
                        if (!loopback)
-                               mbuf_reset(
-                               ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data);
+                               
mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data);
                        if (hc_out || loopback)
                                
mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data);
+                       if (ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data != NULL)
+                               
mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data);
                }
                if (extDdr)
                        preload_harq_ddr(tp->dev_id, queue_id, ops_enq,
@@ -3981,11 +3981,11 @@ throughput_pmd_lcore_ldpc_dec(void *arg)
        for (i = 0; i < TEST_REPETITIONS; ++i) {
                for (j = 0; j < num_ops; ++j) {
                        if (!loopback)
-                               mbuf_reset(
-                               ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data);
+                               
mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.hard_output.data);
                        if (hc_out || loopback)
-                               mbuf_reset(
-                               ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data);
+                               
mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.data);
+                       if (ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data != NULL)
+                               
mbuf_reset(ops_enq[j]->ldpc_dec.soft_output.data);
                }
                if (extDdr)
                        preload_harq_ddr(tp->dev_id, queue_id, ops_enq,

Reply via email to