On 1/17/23 17:50, Hernan Vargas wrote:
To make the test compatible with devices that do not support early
termination, the iteration count assert can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
---
app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index 81bf2c8b60..c68d79cf29 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -2290,6 +2290,7 @@ static int
validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const uint16_t n,
struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *ref_op, const int vector_mask)
{
+ RTE_SET_USED(vector_mask);
Why not just remove vector_mask if it isn't of any use instead of hiding
the warning?
unsigned int i;
int ret;
struct op_data_entries *hard_data_orig =
@@ -2299,17 +2300,12 @@ validate_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ops, const
uint16_t n,
struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *ops_td;
struct rte_bbdev_op_data *hard_output;
struct rte_bbdev_op_data *soft_output;
- struct rte_bbdev_op_turbo_dec *ref_td = &ref_op->turbo_dec;
for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
ops_td = &ops[i]->turbo_dec;
hard_output = &ops_td->hard_output;
soft_output = &ops_td->soft_output;
- if (vector_mask & TEST_BBDEV_VF_EXPECTED_ITER_COUNT)
- TEST_ASSERT(ops_td->iter_count <= ref_td->iter_count,
- "Returned iter_count (%d) > expected
iter_count (%d)",
- ops_td->iter_count, ref_td->iter_count);
ret = check_dec_status_and_ordering(ops[i], i, ref_op->status);
TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret,
"Checking status and ordering for decoder
failed");
Maxime
