On 1/17/23 17:50, Hernan Vargas wrote:
Add support for large TB when it cannot fit into a true mbuf.

Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.var...@intel.com>
---
  app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
index 69b86cdeb1..fdf7a28ba2 100644
--- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
+++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c
@@ -1072,8 +1072,6 @@ init_op_data_objs(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *bufs,
                         * Special case when DPDK mbuf cannot handle
                         * the required input size
                         */
-                       printf("Warning: Larger input size than DPDK mbuf %d\n",
-                                       seg->length);
                        large_input = true;
                }
                bufs[i].data = m_head;
@@ -2030,6 +2028,7 @@ validate_op_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op,
        struct rte_mbuf *m = op->data;
        uint8_t nb_dst_segments = orig_op->nb_segments;
        uint32_t total_data_size = 0;
+       bool ignore_mbuf = false; /* ignore mbuf limitations */
TEST_ASSERT(nb_dst_segments == m->nb_segs,
                        "Number of segments differ in original (%u) and filled (%u) 
op",
@@ -2042,21 +2041,25 @@ validate_op_chain(struct rte_bbdev_op_data *op,
                uint16_t data_len = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m) - offset;
                total_data_size += orig_op->segments[i].length;
- TEST_ASSERT(orig_op->segments[i].length == data_len,
-                               "Length of segment differ in original (%u) and 
filled (%u) op",
-                               orig_op->segments[i].length, data_len);
+               if (orig_op->segments[i].length > RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_E_MAX_MBUF)
+                       ignore_mbuf = true;
+               if (!ignore_mbuf)
+                       TEST_ASSERT(orig_op->segments[i].length == data_len,
+                                       "Length of segment differ in original (%u) 
and filled (%u) op",
+                                       orig_op->segments[i].length, data_len);
                TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(orig_op->segments[i].addr,
                                rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, uint32_t *, offset),
-                               data_len,
+                               orig_op->segments[i].length,

Isn't it ending up in performing out of bounds access in the mbuf?

                                "Output buffers (CB=%u) are not equal", i);
                m = m->next;
        }
/* Validate total mbuf pkt length */
        uint32_t pkt_len = rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(op->data) - op->offset;
-       TEST_ASSERT(total_data_size == pkt_len,
-                       "Length of data differ in original (%u) and filled (%u) 
op",
-                       total_data_size, pkt_len);
+       if (!ignore_mbuf)
+               TEST_ASSERT(total_data_size == pkt_len,
+                               "Length of data differ in original (%u) and filled 
(%u) op",
+                               total_data_size, pkt_len);
return TEST_SUCCESS;
  }

Reply via email to