On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 06:22:10PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Monday, 28 November 2022 18.14
> > 
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 11:17:23AM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, 24 November 2022 00.43
> > > >
> > > > Provide an abstraction for leading and trailing zero bit counting
> > > > functions to hide compiler specific intrinsics and builtins.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > 
> > let me unpack what is being asked for here.
> > 
> > > Related functions already exist in lib/eal/include/rte_common.h.
> > 
> > i don't understand. are you saying these inline functions duplicate
> > existing bit counting functionality? if so i'll relocate any you
> > identify.
> 
> Sorry about not being clear about my intentions with the feedback.
> 
> I'm not asking for anything; I only wanted to point at the similar family of 
> functions in rte_common.h, to make sure that you were aware of them.

oh! not a problem. i'm very keen to catch any mistakes, thought i had
missed something.

> 
> > 
> > >
> > > If some functions are missing, it would be good to add them.
> > 
> > the change here is to address a specific family of functions that are
> > impeding portability of the rte_common.h header and nothing more.
> > 
> > i'm open to having a separate mail thread discussing what other
> > functions we might want and whether to relocate code out of
> > rte_common.h
> > since that is likely to be a drawn out discussion it shouldn't be a
> > blocking dependency of this series.
> 
> I do not request any new functions; I'll leave it up to you to decide if 
> anything would be good to add.
> 
> > 
> > >
> > > Also, it makes sense moving them out of rte_common.h.
> > 
> > thanks!
> 
> Thank you! Cleaning up is always appreciated.

yes, if i can get more rapid approvals there is a lot more in the
pipeline. i'd like gain some momentum if possible.

ty

Reply via email to