> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 9:31 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: gak...@marvell.com; sta...@dpdk.org; Konstantin Ananyev
> <konstantin.v.anan...@yandex.ru>; Iremonger, Bernard
> <bernard.iremon...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] test/ipsec: fix performance test failure
>
> This patch initializes with 0 rte_ipsec_sa_prm inside the ipsec_sa struct.
> Before it was passed uninitialized to rte_ipsec_sa_init(), which does not
> check whether prm->ipsec_xform.esn.value is greater than sa->sqn_mask.
>
> Bugzilla ID: 1023
> Fixes: f7f3ac6dcbe2 ("test/ipsec: add performance cases")
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
> - fix gcc4 warnings
>
> app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c index
> 346a851648..11de9a6aac 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> @@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ testsuite_teardown(void) static int
> test_libipsec_perf(void)
> {
> - struct ipsec_sa sa_out;
> - struct ipsec_sa sa_in;
> + struct ipsec_sa sa_out = { .sa_prm = { 0 } };
> + struct ipsec_sa sa_in = { .sa_prm = { 0 } };
> uint32_t i;
> int ret;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
Tested-by: Yu Jiang <yux.ji...@intel.com>
