This patch initializes with 0 rte_ipsec_sa_prm inside the ipsec_sa struct.
Before it was passed uninitialized to rte_ipsec_sa_init(),
which does not check whether prm->ipsec_xform.esn.value is greater
than sa->sqn_mask.

Bugzilla ID: 1023
Fixes: f7f3ac6dcbe2 ("test/ipsec: add performance cases")
Cc: savinay.dharma...@intel.com
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medved...@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
index 346a851648..580cad00f6 100644
--- a/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
@@ -592,8 +592,8 @@ testsuite_teardown(void)
 static int
 test_libipsec_perf(void)
 {
-       struct ipsec_sa sa_out;
-       struct ipsec_sa sa_in;
+       struct ipsec_sa sa_out = { 0 };
+       struct ipsec_sa sa_in = { 0 };
        uint32_t i;
        int ret;
 
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to