> From: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 9:33 PM
>
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:13:53 +0100
> Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
>
> > > From: Megha Ajmera [mailto:megha.ajm...@intel.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, 22 February 2022 14.19
> > >
> > > Masking of core mask was incorrect. Instead of using 1U for
> > > shifting, it should be using 1LU as the result is assigned to
> > > uint64.
> > >
> > > CID 375859: Potentially overflowing expression "1U << app_main_core"
> > > with
> > > type "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit
> > > arithmetic, and then used in a context that expects an expression of
> > > type "uint64_t"
> > > (64 bits, unsigned).
> > >
> > > Coverity issue: 375859
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Megha Ajmera <megha.ajm...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > examples/qos_sched/args.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/examples/qos_sched/args.c b/examples/qos_sched/args.c
> > > index 10ca7bea61..44f2f5640e 100644
> > > --- a/examples/qos_sched/args.c
> > > +++ b/examples/qos_sched/args.c
> > > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ app_parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
> > > return -1;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > - app_used_core_mask |= 1u << app_main_core;
> > > + app_used_core_mask |= 1lu << app_main_core;
> >
> > Still wrong on 32 bit platforms, where long unsigned int is still 32 bits.
> >
> > Use this instead:
> > app_used_core_mask |= RTE_BIT64(app_main_core);
>
> DPDK now supports > 64 lcores. So all code using/assuming a 64 bit mask is
> broken.
I checked in dpdk-testpmd and looks like it still does not support more than 64
cores.
Here is the snippet:
else if (set_fwd_lcores_mask((uint64_t) cm) < 0)
rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "coremask is not valid\n");
It is type casting the core mask to uint64_t.
