> Application calculates segment size based on buffer size plus
> digest size only, But if the operation mode is IPsec then
> packet length can be increased up to 73 bytes due to IPsec
> overhead.
> 

Can you explain the calculation for 73 bytes in the code?
Will it be sufficient for IPv6?

> In this patch, adding the IPsec overhead length in segment size
> when there is no user given segment size.
> 
> Fixes: 28dde5da503e ("app/crypto-perf: support lookaside IPsec")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <g.si...@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2-change-log:
> Update commit message with fixline.
> 
>  app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h         | 1 +
>  app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options_parsing.c | 5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h b/app/test-crypto-
> perf/cperf_options.h
> index 031b238b20..cdbc027b89 100644
> --- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h
> +++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options.h
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
>  #define CPERF_PMDCC_DELAY_MS ("pmd-cyclecount-delay-ms")
> 
>  #define MAX_LIST 32
> +#define CPERF_IPSEC_OVERHEAD 73
> 
>  enum cperf_perf_test_type {
>       CPERF_TEST_TYPE_THROUGHPUT,
> diff --git a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options_parsing.c b/app/test-crypto-
> perf/cperf_options_parsing.c
> index c244f81bbf..268f544936 100644
> --- a/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options_parsing.c
> +++ b/app/test-crypto-perf/cperf_options_parsing.c
> @@ -1132,9 +1132,12 @@ cperf_options_check(struct cperf_options
> *options)
>        * If segment size is not set, assume only one segment,
>        * big enough to contain the largest buffer and the digest
>        */
> -     if (options->segment_sz == 0)
> +     if (options->segment_sz == 0) {
>               options->segment_sz = options->max_buffer_size +
>                               options->digest_sz;
> +             if (options->op_type == CPERF_IPSEC)
> +                     options->segment_sz += CPERF_IPSEC_OVERHEAD;
> +     }
> 
>       if (options->segment_sz < options->digest_sz) {
>               RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> --
> 2.25.1

Reply via email to