On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 7:17 PM Jim Harris <james.r.har...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> clang-13 rightfully complains that the tot_ppi
> variable in update_stats is set but not used, since
> the final accumulated tot_ppi results isn't used
> anywhere. So just remove the tot_ppi variable.
Dead code, from the start...
Fixes: 450f0791312c ("power: add traffic pattern aware power control")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.har...@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/power/rte_power_empty_poll.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/power/rte_power_empty_poll.c
> b/lib/power/rte_power_empty_poll.c
> index 975aa92997..8a2d60c576 100644
> --- a/lib/power/rte_power_empty_poll.c
> +++ b/lib/power/rte_power_empty_poll.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ update_training_stats(struct priority_worker *poll_stats,
> static __rte_always_inline uint32_t
> update_stats(struct priority_worker *poll_stats)
> {
> - uint64_t tot_edpi = 0, tot_ppi = 0;
> + uint64_t tot_edpi = 0;
> uint32_t j, percent;
>
> struct priority_worker *s = poll_stats;
> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ update_stats(struct priority_worker *poll_stats)
>
> for (j = 0; j < BINS_AV; j++) {
> tot_edpi += s->edpi_av[j];
> - tot_ppi += s->ppi_av[j];
> }
>
> tot_edpi = tot_edpi / BINS_AV;
> --
> 2.32.0
>
I don't think keeping ppi_av[] (and related data struct) is that
useful.. but in any case patch lgtm:
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
--
David Marchand
