Allow the user to skip passing the "out" parameters to the
rte_dmadev_completed() API call, by using local replacements in the
inline function. This simplifies drivers, and compilers should be able
to remove the branches at compile time in many cases.

Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com>
---
 lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.h b/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.h
index 8cfe14dd2..eb78f3805 100644
--- a/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.h
+++ b/lib/dmadev/rte_dmadev.h
@@ -698,9 +698,11 @@ rte_dmadev_perform(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t vq_id)
  * @param nb_cpls
  *   The maximum number of completed operations that can be processed.
  * @param[out] last_idx
- *   The last completed operation's index, as returned when entry was enqueued
+ *   The last completed operation's index, as returned when entry was enqueued.
+ *   If not required, NULL can be passed in.
  * @param[out] has_error
  *   Indicates if there are transfer error.
+ *   If not required, may be passed as NULL.
  *
  * @return
  *   The number of operations that successful completed.
@@ -714,7 +716,20 @@ rte_dmadev_completed(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t vq_id, 
const uint16_t nb_cpls,
                     uint16_t *last_idx, bool *has_error)
 {
        struct rte_dmadev *dev = &rte_dmadevices[dev_id];
-       has_error = false;
+       bool err = false;
+       uint16_t idx;
+
+       /* ensure the pointer values are non-null to simplify drivers.
+        * In most cases these should be compile time evaluated, since this is 
an inline function.
+        * - If NULL is explicitly passed as parameter, then compiler knows the 
value is NULL
+        * - If address of local variable is passed as parameter, then compiler 
can
+        *   know it's non-NULL.
+        */
+       if (has_error == NULL)
+               has_error = &err;
+       if (last_idx == NULL)
+               last_idx = &idx;
+
        return (*dev->completed)(dev, vq_id, nb_cpls, last_idx, has_error);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2

Reply via email to