On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:30 PM Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/06/2021 11:05, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:05 AM Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Christian,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com>
> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:49 AM
> >>> To: dpdk stable <sta...@dpdk.org>
> >>> Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Abhishek Marathe
> >>> <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>;
> >>> Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin
> >>> <benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen
> >>> <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad
> >>> <hariprasad.govindhara...@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> >>> <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin
> >>> Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com>;
> >>> Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor
> >>> <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang
> >>> <pezh...@redhat.com>; Yu, PingX <pingx...@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q
> >>> <qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; NBU-
> >>> Contact-Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan
> >>> <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:52 AM Christian Ehrhardt
> >>> <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is version 2 of the list of patches targeted for stable release 
> >>>> 19.11.9.
> >>>> Thanks to plenty of helpful developers we've collected a few more
> >>>> backports by now and sorted out a few rare compile time issues that were
> >>> found with -rc1.
> >>>>
> >>>> The planned date for the final release of 19.11.9 is now 18th of June.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> >>>> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
> >>>> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
> >>>>
> >>>> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
> >>>>
> >>>>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.9-rc2
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately there were further build issues with new suse kernels.
> >>> The fix for some of them, now breaks others :-/ The final fix didn't 
> >>> finalize
> >>> yet, but as a TL;DR it means there will be a -rc3 down the road.
> >>>
> >>> I beg your pardon for the extra work.
> >>> If you are testing non-suse and are already deep into the tests you 
> >>> likely can
> >>> continue that.
> >>> If you didn't start your tests yet then I'd recommend holding back until 
> >>> -rc3
> >>> exists.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I see some build failures with gcc 11. Do we expect this release to 
> >> support it?
> >
> > I have added all that were targeted at stable@dpdk, but I remember
> > that Kevin mentioned a few missing in 20.11.x due to the submissions
> > missing to go to stable@dpdk.
> > The same could be the case here.
> > @Kevin could you have a look at 19.11 and if there are some missing
> > point me to the commits to pick up?
> >
> > @Ali - if you have a particular bug signature that might help to
> > identify the right patch.
> >
>
> They will all note 'GCC' (or gcc) in the commit msg. Most will have an
> example of the 'warning' they resolved too. There was also bugzillas
> opened for them all i think, which note the fixing commit. So if you
> find any issues when building, you could cross-reference between warning
> in commit/warning in Bz and fixing commit. Of course there may be some
> new issues pop up in older code that was later changed/replaced in main.
>
> There was also 2 commits needed for clang 12 support (my bad for missing
> tags on these).
> 5ac070cfed test/cmdline: silence clang 12 warning
> 414245bbc5 test/cmdline: fix inputs array


Compiler patches in main:

I've rechecked all those to see why they were missing (if they did)
to find if anything else is missing as well.

GCC:
71acf81bf7 doc: add GCC 11 and clang 12 support to release notes
  - not targetted at stable (ok to be missing)
50eea2bfa7 test: fix build with GCC 11
 - this got all missed due to the same problem Xueming had reported
099db3d156 crypto/zuc: fix build with GCC 11
 - fixed code is only in 20.05
8f73a72378 test/crypto: fix build with GCC 11
33c12ac5ba test/table: fix build with GCC 11
a625ab89df net/tap: fix build with GCC 11
97de3819ed net/ice/base: fix build with GCC 11
ab70be7e2d net/bnx2x: fix build with GCC 11
b3c740e037 net/bnx2x: fix build with GCC 11
 - these got all missed due to the same problem Xueming had reported
8e2dd74f0a acl: fix build with GCC 11
  - I've seen this one but it fixes code that is only in 20.11

Clang:
5ac070cfed test/cmdline: silence clang 12 warning
414245bbc5 test/cmdline: fix inputs array

Those two just were not tagged, that is fine and they will be added this round.

I was able to identify quite a few more affected by the same issue
So I thank you a lot for pushing on this!

> >> I also see some doxygen errors with version 1.9.1 in Fedora Rawhide. Will 
> >> open a Bugzilla ticket.
> >
> > Rawhide builds of 19.11.x were broken for a while now, but yeah filing
> > the bug surely is the right path.
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ali
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

Reply via email to