Hi Christian, > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2021 11:49 AM > To: dpdk stable <sta...@dpdk.org> > Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>; Abhishek Marathe > <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; > Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; Walker, Benjamin > <benjamin.wal...@intel.com>; David Christensen > <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Govindharajan, Hariprasad > <hariprasad.govindhara...@intel.com>; Hemant Agrawal > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin > Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; > Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor > <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang > <pezh...@redhat.com>; Yu, PingX <pingx...@intel.com>; Xu, Qian Q > <qian.q...@intel.com>; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@nvidia.com>; NBU- > Contact-Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Peng, Yuan > <yuan.p...@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.c...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.9 patches review and test - V2 > > On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 7:52 AM Christian Ehrhardt > <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Here is version 2 of the list of patches targeted for stable release > > 19.11.9. > > Thanks to plenty of helpful developers we've collected a few more > > backports by now and sorted out a few rare compile time issues that were > found with -rc1. > > > > The planned date for the final release of 19.11.9 is now 18th of June. > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > > the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v19.11.9-rc2 > > Unfortunately there were further build issues with new suse kernels. > The fix for some of them, now breaks others :-/ The final fix didn't finalize > yet, but as a TL;DR it means there will be a -rc3 down the road. > > I beg your pardon for the extra work. > If you are testing non-suse and are already deep into the tests you likely can > continue that. > If you didn't start your tests yet then I'd recommend holding back until -rc3 > exists. >
I see some build failures with gcc 11. Do we expect this release to support it? I also see some doxygen errors with version 1.9.1 in Fedora Rawhide. Will open a Bugzilla ticket. Thanks, Ali
