On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 6:17 PM Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu> wrote: > > > > On 25/03/2021 12:46, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:33 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > >> > >> 25/03/2021 11:58, Kinsella, Ray: > >>> On 25/03/2021 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>>> 25/03/2021 11:42, Thomas Monjalon: > >>>>> 24/03/2021 11:55, Jerin Jacob: > >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:33 PM <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Due to Linux kernel dependency, only enable build for 64bit Linux. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> I've reorganized the commits per family of drivers, > >>>>> so it makes more sense than grouping per driver class > >>>>> with "common/octeontx" for title for all: > >>>>> > >>>>> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >>>>> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >>>>> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >>>>> > >>>>> and applied. > >>>> > >>>> Actually not applied yet. > >>>> I'm not sure what to do for the ABI check which is broken > >>>> because some drivers are not compiled anymore in 32-bit build. > >>>> I've workarounded locally by removing the dump files in the reference > >>>> build. > >>>> Should we add an exception in libabigail.abignore? > >>>> > >>> In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to > >>> be same as an ABI Breakage. > >>> > >>> From the policy ... > >>> "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for > >>> hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI > >>> change." > >> > >> So the patches should wait 21.11. > >> Everybody agree? > > > > Looks good to me to postpone. > > > > @Ray Kinsella @Thomas Monjalon @McDaniel, Timothy @David Marchand @Neil > > Horman > > > > Currently, I merged DLB v1 driver removal patch to next-eventdev. Is > > this ABI breakge[1]? > > > > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210316210812.15614-1-timothy.mcdan...@intel.com/ > > > > [1] > > From the policy ... > > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for > > hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI > > change." > > +1
Is +1 for not to remove the dlb driver or remove it?
