On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 4:33 PM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: > > 25/03/2021 11:58, Kinsella, Ray: > > On 25/03/2021 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 25/03/2021 11:42, Thomas Monjalon: > > >> 24/03/2021 11:55, Jerin Jacob: > > >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:33 PM <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > > >>>> > > >>>> Due to Linux kernel dependency, only enable build for 64bit Linux. > > >>>> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > > >>> > > >>> Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com> > > >> > > >> I've reorganized the commits per family of drivers, > > >> so it makes more sense than grouping per driver class > > >> with "common/octeontx" for title for all: > > >> > > >> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > > >> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > > >> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > > >> > > >> and applied. > > > > > > Actually not applied yet. > > > I'm not sure what to do for the ABI check which is broken > > > because some drivers are not compiled anymore in 32-bit build. > > > I've workarounded locally by removing the dump files in the reference > > > build. > > > Should we add an exception in libabigail.abignore? > > > > > In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to be > > same as an ABI Breakage. > > > > From the policy ... > > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for > > hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI > > change." > > So the patches should wait 21.11. > Everybody agree?
Looks good to me to postpone. @Ray Kinsella @Thomas Monjalon @McDaniel, Timothy @David Marchand @Neil Horman Currently, I merged DLB v1 driver removal patch to next-eventdev. Is this ABI breakge[1]? http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210316210812.15614-1-timothy.mcdan...@intel.com/ [1] >From the policy ... "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change."
