25/03/2021 11:58, Kinsella, Ray: > On 25/03/2021 10:46, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 25/03/2021 11:42, Thomas Monjalon: > >> 24/03/2021 11:55, Jerin Jacob: > >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:33 PM <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > >>>> > >>>> Due to Linux kernel dependency, only enable build for 64bit Linux. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> > >>> > >>> Series Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com> > >> > >> I've reorganized the commits per family of drivers, > >> so it makes more sense than grouping per driver class > >> with "common/octeontx" for title for all: > >> > >> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux > >> > >> and applied. > > > > Actually not applied yet. > > I'm not sure what to do for the ABI check which is broken > > because some drivers are not compiled anymore in 32-bit build. > > I've workarounded locally by removing the dump files in the reference build. > > Should we add an exception in libabigail.abignore? > > > In the past we said that depreciating HW support would be considered to be > same as an ABI Breakage. > > From the policy ... > "Updates to the minimum hardware requirements, which drop support for > hardware which was previously supported, should be treated as an ABI change."
So the patches should wait 21.11. Everybody agree?
