> > > Struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 will be modified to include additional
> > > values, indicating existence or absence of IPv6 extension headers
> > > following the IPv6 header, as proposed in RFC
> > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177257.html.
> > > Because of ABI break this change is proposed for 20.11.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com>
> > > ---
> > > +* ethdev: The ``struct rte_flow_item_ipv6`` struct will be modified to
> > include
> > > +  additional values, indicating existence or absence of IPv6 extension
> > headers
> > > +  following the IPv6 header, as proposed in RFC
> > > +  https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177257.html.
> >
> > That's the same idea as VLAN item, but for IPv6 extensions.
> > We need to address the issues of variable header parts with rte_flow, so
> > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybche...@solarflare.com>
> Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>

Applied


Reply via email to