On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:30 AM Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 03/08/2020 21:51, Dekel Peled: > > Struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 will be modified to include additional > > values, indicating existence or absence of IPv6 extension headers > > following the IPv6 header, as proposed in RFC > > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177257.html. > > Because of ABI break this change is proposed for 20.11. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dek...@mellanox.com> > > --- > > +* ethdev: The ``struct rte_flow_item_ipv6`` struct will be modified to > include > > + additional values, indicating existence or absence of IPv6 extension > headers > > + following the IPv6 header, as proposed in RFC > > + https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177257.html. > > That's the same idea as VLAN item, but for IPv6 extensions. > We need to address the issues of variable header parts with rte_flow, so > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> > Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
