On 08/07/2020 14:15, David Marchand wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:09 PM Kinsella, Ray <m...@ashroe.eu> wrote:
>>
>> + Aaron
>>
>> On 08/07/2020 11:22, David Marchand wrote:
>>> abidiff can provide some more information about the ABI difference it
>>> detected.
>>> In all cases, a discussion on the mailing must happen but we can give
>>> some hints to know if this is a problem with the script calling abidiff,
>>> a potential ABI breakage or an unambiguous ABI breakage.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> devtools/check-abi.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/devtools/check-abi.sh b/devtools/check-abi.sh
>>> index e17fedbd9f..521e2cce7c 100755
>>> --- a/devtools/check-abi.sh
>>> +++ b/devtools/check-abi.sh
>>> @@ -50,10 +50,22 @@ for dump in $(find $refdir -name "*.dump"); do
>>> error=1
>>> continue
>>> fi
>>> - if ! abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2; then
>>> + abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2 || {
>>> + abiret=$?
>>> echo "Error: ABI issue reported for 'abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS
>>> $dump $dump2'"
>>> error=1
>>> - fi
>>> + echo
>>> + if [ $(($abiret & 3)) != 0 ]; then
>>> + echo "ABIDIFF_ERROR|ABIDIFF_USAGE_ERROR, please
>>> report this to dev@dpdk.org."
>
> Forgot to --amend.
> Hopefully yes, this will be reported to dev@dpdk.org... I wanted to
> highlight this could be a script or env issue.
>
>
>>> + fi
>>> + if [ $(($abiret & 4)) != 0 ]; then
>>> + echo "ABIDIFF_ABI_CHANGE, this change requires a
>>> review (abidiff flagged this as a potential issue)."
>>> + fi
>>> + if [ $(($abiret & 8)) != 0 ]; then
>>> + echo "ABIDIFF_ABI_INCOMPATIBLE_CHANGE, this change
>>> breaks the ABI."
>>> + fi
>>> + echo
>>> + }
>>> done
>>>
>>> [ -z "$error" ] || [ -n "$warnonly" ]
>>>
>>
>> This look good to me, my only thought was can we do anything to help the ABI
>> checks play nice with Travis.
>> At the moment it takes time to find the failure reason in the Travis log.
>
> I usually look for "FILES_TO" to get to the last error.
>
Right, but there is hopefully a better way to give Travis some clues ...
