abidiff can provide some more information about the ABI difference it detected. In all cases, a discussion on the mailing must happen but we can give some hints to know if this is a problem with the script calling abidiff, a potential ABI breakage or an unambiguous ABI breakage.
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> --- devtools/check-abi.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/devtools/check-abi.sh b/devtools/check-abi.sh index e17fedbd9f..521e2cce7c 100755 --- a/devtools/check-abi.sh +++ b/devtools/check-abi.sh @@ -50,10 +50,22 @@ for dump in $(find $refdir -name "*.dump"); do error=1 continue fi - if ! abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2; then + abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2 || { + abiret=$? echo "Error: ABI issue reported for 'abidiff $ABIDIFF_OPTIONS $dump $dump2'" error=1 - fi + echo + if [ $(($abiret & 3)) != 0 ]; then + echo "ABIDIFF_ERROR|ABIDIFF_USAGE_ERROR, please report this to dev@dpdk.org." + fi + if [ $(($abiret & 4)) != 0 ]; then + echo "ABIDIFF_ABI_CHANGE, this change requires a review (abidiff flagged this as a potential issue)." + fi + if [ $(($abiret & 8)) != 0 ]; then + echo "ABIDIFF_ABI_INCOMPATIBLE_CHANGE, this change breaks the ABI." + fi + echo + } done [ -z "$error" ] || [ -n "$warnonly" ] -- 2.23.0