Hello,
David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> writes:
>> > +
>> > LIBABIGAIL_REPO=${LIBABIGAIL_REPO:-https://sourceware.org/git/libabigail.git}
>> > + LIBABIGAIL_VERSION=${LIBABIGAIL_VERSION:-libabigail-1.6}
>> > +
>> > + if [ "$(cat libabigail/VERSION 2>/dev/null)" != "$LIBABIGAIL_VERSION"
>> > ]; then
>> > + rm -rf libabigail
>> > + # if we change libabigail, invalidate existing abi cache
>> > + rm -rf reference
>> > + fi
>> > +
>> > + if [ ! -d libabigail ]; then
>> > + git clone --single-branch -b $LIBABIGAIL_VERSION $LIBABIGAIL_REPO
>> > libabigail/src
>>
>> Why not using the tarball?
>> http://mirrors.kernel.org/sourceware/libabigail/libabigail-1.6.tar.gz
>
> No good reason "now".
>
> I was first bitten by a reference to redhat-hardened-ld in some
> libtool script in the tarball (/me looks in Dodji direction).
> I then considered switching to different versions of libabigail by
> just setting the LIBABIGAIL_VERSION env variable from .travis.yml.
> I ended up with the current latest version which is also what is in
> Ubuntu latest releases.
I think either way (distro package, tarball and git) has some benefits
and drawbacks.
I think one benefit of /being able/ to use the code from git is for
cases where you guys need some new features (and we tend to continuously
add fixes/functionalities to the git repository) that is available in
git only for now. Hopefully, with time, you'll only need to use the
distro package.
FWIW, I like the fact that your setup lets you choose between the distro
package, the tarball or the git code. That's powerful.
Cheers,
--
Dodji
