04/02/2020 11:10, Trahe, Fiona: > And not used for sizing > > > > > There a c) though right. > > > We could work around the issue by api versioning rte_cryptodev_info_get() > > > and friends. > > > > It has a lot of friends, but it sounds like the right approach. > > Is someone looking into this? > [Fiona] Yes. But not clear yet if can be done by tomorrow.
Should be done by today now. > But even if feasible, that only works around the current issue. > There is a bigger issue to be decided here - > Should we be removing LIST_END/MAX values from all enums in 20.11? > Or defining through API comment that they should only be used as a range > boundary and > NOT to size an array. And so having a fixed value is not part of the API > contract. Please let's discuss 20.11 API later. It is not so urgent.
