On 1/16/2020 12:44 PM, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> Add support for ESP flows to testpmd.
> Improve debug information in testpmd and the i40e PMD.
> Process ESP flows on the i40e Flow Director.
> 
> Changes in V7: 
> -------------
> Dropped the following debug patch from v6 patchset
> 0003-app-testpmd-dump-Rx-and-Tx-mbuf.patch
> Included release notes and doc patches in feature patches.
> 
> Changes in V6: 
> -------------
> Rebase to latest master branch
> Fixed patch 0001-app-testpmd-parse-flow-command-line-for-ESP.patch
> Dropped the following v5 patch due to ABI breakage:
> 0012-librte_ethdev-add-ESP-and-AH-flow-types-to-RSS.patch
> 
> Changes in V5: 
> -------------
> Rebase to latest master branch
> Update 0012-librte_ethdev-add-ESP-and-AH-flow-types-to-RSS.patch
> 
> Changes in V4: 
> -------------
> Add extra patch for testpmd
> Add extra patch for config
> Split v3 patch "net/i40e: process ESP flows" into 4 patches
> 
> Changes in V3: 
> -------------
> Added i40e_flow_set_filter_spi() function in i40e_flow.c
> Set UDP destination port to 4500 for ESP  in i40e_ethdev.h
> Split flow structures into 4 instead of 2 in i40e_ethdev.h
> Dropped extra printf from commandline_flow.c
> 
> Changes in V2: 
> --------------
> Moved change in app/test-pmd/config.c to a seperate patch.
> Added extra parameter to fill_ip6_head() in i40e_fdir.c
> set is_udp to false in i40e_flow_fdir_get_pctype_value() in i40e_flow.c
> Bernard Iremonger (10):
>   app/testpmd: parse flow command line for ESP
>   app/testpmd: improve debug
>   net/i40e: improve RSS debug
>   net/i40e: handle ESP tunnel
>   net/i40e: support ipsec-ah profile
>   net/i40e: support ESP in customized code
>   net/i40e: support ESP flows
>   net/i40e: support ESP in Flow Director
>   config: add debug to I40E Flow Director
>   net/i40e: display Flow Director packet

Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.

(Except 9/10 & 10/10, they are dropped while merging.)

Series wasn't rebased on next-net, I had to resolve conflict almost in all
patches, can you please validate the result in next-net?

Reply via email to