On 1/15/2020 3:53 PM, Bernard Iremonger wrote: > add call to rte_pktmbuf_dump() in dump_pkt_burst in util.c > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremon...@intel.com> > --- > app/test-pmd/util.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/app/test-pmd/util.c b/app/test-pmd/util.c > index b514be5..bf03873 100644 > --- a/app/test-pmd/util.c > +++ b/app/test-pmd/util.c > @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ dump_pkt_burst(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t queue, struct > rte_mbuf *pkts[], > printf(" ol_flags: %s\n", buf); > if (rte_mbuf_check(mb, 1, &reason) < 0) > printf("INVALID mbuf: %s\n", reason); > + rte_pktmbuf_dump(stdout, pkts[i], pkts[i]->data_len); > } > } > >
I am not sure about this change, 'dump_pkt_burst' is good for debugging and getting the packet metadata, but having mbuf dump for each packet can make it very verbose and harder to use. If there is a need for it, can we add it with another command? like verbose value 0,1,2,3 defines the dump_pkt_burst level, why not add a new level to dump mbuf?