Hi David, > -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 22:04 > To: Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) <ruifeng.w...@arm.com> > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>; Honnappa > Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Kantecki, Tomasz > <tomasz.kante...@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology > China) <gavin...@arm.com>; nd <n...@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] add lock-free mode for l3fwd > > Hello Ruifeng, > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:30 AM Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) > <ruifeng.w...@arm.com> wrote: > > > Not sure why it has to be master core? > > > Why interrupt thread wouldn't do? > > > I think what we need to: > > > 1. introduce reading routes from config file instead of having them > > > hard- coded within the app. > > > 2. add ability to update routes dynamically. > > > Probably the easiest (and commonly used way) re-read conf file > > > and update routes on the signal (SIGUSR1 or so). > > > Konstantin > > > > > > > > Sorry for delayed response. Just back from vacation. > > Thanks for your suggestion. > > I will try the config file based updating approach and get back with new > version. > > Any update on this series?
I heard different opinions on the approach. Currently no new version patch set available. Will have more discussion before respin. > > > -- > David Marchand
