Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye, Xiaolong
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 11:11 AM
> To: Di, ChenxuX <chenxux...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix device hotplug remove
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/07, Di, ChenxuX wrote:
> >Hi, Xiaolong
> >
> >About pf and vf for fm10k, e1000, igb, ixgbe, ice, i40e; only i40e pf
> >and ixgbe vf use
>
> For fm10k, e1000, igb, ice, please check whether they have called
> rte_eth_dev_release_port in the remove ops.
>
The function rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove will call rte_eth_dev_release_port
After the uninit function of drivers.
> >Rte_eth_dev_destory() in their remove function, others have already use the
> generic remove function.
> >
> >I have send another patch about ixgbe because they fix different commits.
>
> For i40e and ixgbe, please address the comments I raised in previous mail.
>
When app detach a port without a close, it will call the remove function,
What will uninit the port and rte_eth_dev_release_port.
Thx
Di Chenxu
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong
>
> >
> >Thanks
> >Di Chenxu
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ye, Xiaolong
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:50 AM
> >> To: Di, ChenxuX <chenxux...@intel.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
> >> <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix device hotplug
> >> remove
> >>
> >> On 11/06, Di ChenxuX wrote:
> >> >testpmd will occur infinite loops when device hotplug remove.
> >> >We can fix the issue by using the pci generic remove function
> >> >
> >> >Fixes: ac89d46096d5 ("net/i40e: release port upon close")
> >> >
> >> >Signed-off-by: Di ChenxuX <chenxux...@intel.com>
> >> >
> >> >v2:
> >> >change the code in driver.
> >> >---
> >> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 12 +-----------
> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> >diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> >> >b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 77a46832c..64842867d 100644
> >> >--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> >> >+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> >> >@@ -694,17 +694,7 @@ eth_i40e_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver
> >> >*pci_drv __rte_unused,
> >> >
> >> > static int eth_i40e_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev) {
> >> >- struct rte_eth_dev *ethdev;
> >> >-
> >> >- ethdev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(pci_dev->device.name);
> >> >- if (!ethdev)
> >> >- return -ENODEV;
> >> >-
> >> >-
> >> >- if (ethdev->data->dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_REPRESENTOR)
> >> >- return rte_eth_dev_destroy(ethdev,
> >> i40e_vf_representor_uninit);
> >> >- else
> >> >- return rte_eth_dev_destroy(ethdev, eth_i40e_dev_uninit);
> >> >+ return rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove(pci_dev,
> >> >+eth_i40e_dev_uninit);
> >>
> >> What about i40e_vf_representor_uninit, you also need to take it into
> >> consideration.
> >>
> >> And you should also call rte_eth_dev_release_port in remove ops in
> >> case user detach a port directly without closing it first.
> >>
> >> This comment also applies your ixgbe fix.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Xiaolong
> >>
> >>
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > static struct rte_pci_driver rte_i40e_pmd = {
> >> >--
> >> >2.17.1
> >> >
