Hi,
On 11/07, Di, ChenxuX wrote:
>Hi, Xiaolong
>
>About pf and vf for fm10k, e1000, igb, ixgbe, ice, i40e; only i40e pf and
>ixgbe vf use
For fm10k, e1000, igb, ice, please check whether they have called
rte_eth_dev_release_port
in the remove ops.
>Rte_eth_dev_destory() in their remove function, others have already use the
>generic remove function.
>
>I have send another patch about ixgbe because they fix different commits.
For i40e and ixgbe, please address the comments I raised in previous mail.
Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>Thanks
>Di Chenxu
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ye, Xiaolong
>> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 10:50 AM
>> To: Di, ChenxuX <chenxux...@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo...@intel.com>; Yang, Qiming
>> <qiming.y...@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix device hotplug remove
>>
>> On 11/06, Di ChenxuX wrote:
>> >testpmd will occur infinite loops when device hotplug remove.
>> >We can fix the issue by using the pci generic remove function
>> >
>> >Fixes: ac89d46096d5 ("net/i40e: release port upon close")
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Di ChenxuX <chenxux...@intel.com>
>> >
>> >v2:
>> >change the code in driver.
>> >---
>> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 12 +-----------
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>> >b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 77a46832c..64842867d 100644
>> >--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>> >+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
>> >@@ -694,17 +694,7 @@ eth_i40e_pci_probe(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv
>> >__rte_unused,
>> >
>> > static int eth_i40e_pci_remove(struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev) {
>> >- struct rte_eth_dev *ethdev;
>> >-
>> >- ethdev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(pci_dev->device.name);
>> >- if (!ethdev)
>> >- return -ENODEV;
>> >-
>> >-
>> >- if (ethdev->data->dev_flags & RTE_ETH_DEV_REPRESENTOR)
>> >- return rte_eth_dev_destroy(ethdev,
>> i40e_vf_representor_uninit);
>> >- else
>> >- return rte_eth_dev_destroy(ethdev, eth_i40e_dev_uninit);
>> >+ return rte_eth_dev_pci_generic_remove(pci_dev, eth_i40e_dev_uninit);
>>
>> What about i40e_vf_representor_uninit, you also need to take it into
>> consideration.
>>
>> And you should also call rte_eth_dev_release_port in remove ops in case user
>> detach a port directly without closing it first.
>>
>> This comment also applies your ixgbe fix.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xiaolong
>>
>>
>> > }
>> >
>> > static struct rte_pci_driver rte_i40e_pmd = {
>> >--
>> >2.17.1
>> >
