>Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <pbhagavat...@marvell.com> writes: > >>>> > >>>> >Any review? >>>> > >>>> >Are we missing an update in the unit test to catch this issue? >>>> >Thanks. >>>> >>>> We actually caught it in a unit test >>>> >test_reciprocal_division >>> >>>We had this problem since the very start then. >>> >>>Both reciprocal_division and reciprocal_division_perf are in the >"perf" >>>list. >>>Can they be promoted to the standard list? >> >> Both of these tests take >=5 min depending on the platform in use >which is why >> they are placed in perf tests. > >Is it possible to write a smaller set of tests that can be put in the >standard list? >
Currently we have MAX_ITERATIONS (1ULL << 32) for both the tests maybe we can reduce it to 1 << 16 for the normal case? >>> >>> >>>-- >>>David Marchand
