>> > >> >Any review? >> > >> >Are we missing an update in the unit test to catch this issue? >> >Thanks. >> >> We actually caught it in a unit test >> >test_reciprocal_division > >We had this problem since the very start then. > >Both reciprocal_division and reciprocal_division_perf are in the "perf" >list. >Can they be promoted to the standard list?
Both of these tests take >=5 min depending on the platform in use which is why they are placed in perf tests. > > >-- >David Marchand
