Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula <[email protected]> writes: >>> > >>> >Any review? >>> > >>> >Are we missing an update in the unit test to catch this issue? >>> >Thanks. >>> >>> We actually caught it in a unit test >>> >test_reciprocal_division >> >>We had this problem since the very start then. >> >>Both reciprocal_division and reciprocal_division_perf are in the "perf" >>list. >>Can they be promoted to the standard list? > > Both of these tests take >=5 min depending on the platform in use which is why > they are placed in perf tests.
Is it possible to write a smaller set of tests that can be put in the standard list? >> >> >>-- >>David Marchand
