On 10/14/19 4:36 PM, Simei Su wrote:
This patch reserves several bits as input set selection from the
high end of the 64 bits. It is combined with exisiting ETH_RSS_*
to represent RSS types. This patch also checks the simultaneous
use of SRC_ONLY and DST_ONLY of the same level.

Signed-off-by: Simei Su <simei...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ori Kam <or...@mellanox.com>
---
  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c |  5 +++++
  lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
index 7caaa0b..69a3d71 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
@@ -1269,6 +1269,9 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
                goto rollback;
        }
+ RTE_ETH_RSS_HF_REFINE(dev->data->dev_conf.rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf,
+                               dev_conf->rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf);
+
        /* Check that device supports requested rss hash functions. */
        if ((dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads |
             dev_conf->rx_adv_conf.rss_conf.rss_hf) !=
@@ -3112,6 +3115,8 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
        if (ret != 0)
                return ret;
+ RTE_ETH_RSS_HF_REFINE(rss_conf->rss_hf, rss_conf->rss_hf);
+
        dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
        if ((dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads | rss_conf->rss_hf) !=
            dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads) {
diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
index 40aa6a3..389a3e6 100644
--- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -165,6 +165,17 @@
  #define RTE_ETHDEV_LOG(level, ...) \
        rte_log(RTE_LOG_ ## level, rte_eth_dev_logtype, "" __VA_ARGS__)
+#define RTE_ETH_RSS_HF_REFINE(output, input) do { \
+       if ((input & ETH_RSS_L3_SRC_ONLY) &&              \
+               (input & ETH_RSS_L3_DST_ONLY))            \
+               output = input & (~(ETH_RSS_L3_SRC_ONLY | \
+                       ETH_RSS_L3_DST_ONLY));            \
+       if ((input & ETH_RSS_L4_SRC_ONLY) &&              \
+               (input & ETH_RSS_L4_DST_ONLY))            \
+               output = input & (~(ETH_RSS_L4_SRC_ONLY | \
+                       ETH_RSS_L4_DST_ONLY));            \
+} while (0)
+
  struct rte_mbuf;
/**

Sorry, I missed why macro is used. Inline function is better and
easier to read since macros which modify one of its parameters
are very error-prone.

Reply via email to