Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce ABI change on eal and kni

[Arnon Warshavsky]

>
>
> Changing 'kni_fifo_init()' return type shouldn't be a problem at all,
> perhaps it would be a problem if the content of the fifo changed but it is
> not
> the case.
>

Should I move this patch to deferred or reject?