On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 04:26:57 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> index 10bdfb37e..33cffc498 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
> @@ -330,8 +330,7 @@ uint16_t
> rte_eth_find_next(uint16_t port_id)
> {
> while (port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS &&
> - rte_eth_devices[port_id].state != RTE_ETH_DEV_ATTACHED &&
> - rte_eth_devices[port_id].state != RTE_ETH_DEV_REMOVED)
> + rte_eth_devices[port_id].state == RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED)
For some applications that iterate over ports this is a hot path.
What about keeping an unused port bit mask and using ffs (in the future)?
