03/04/2019 01:42, Ferruh Yigit: > On 4/1/2019 3:26 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > +__rte_experimental > > +uint16_t rte_eth_find_next_of(uint16_t port_id_start, > > + const struct rte_device *parent); > > Minor nit, but other instances using the tag as: > > uint16_t __rte_experimental > rte_eth_find_next_of(uint16_t port_id_start, > const struct rte_device *parent); > > What do you think updating it for consistency? Same for two APIs.
I think I did it this way to minimize the patch removing it later. I'm OK to change it for consistency.
