On 10/16/2018 4:45 PM, Joseph, Anoob wrote: > Don't you need to use /** (or /*) instead of /**< when the comment is before > the member? I think the first member ('int8_t bearer') would have it right. > Rest could end up wrong. Can you try building the docs and see if it's coming > off well. If it's coming off well, you can proceed with applying the patch. Thanks for notifying this. Will correct it while applying.
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: support pdcp o... Akhil Goyal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: add sample pdc... Akhil Goyal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] security: support for pdcp Akhil Goyal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: support p... Akhil Goyal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] security: support pdcp prot... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] security: support p... Joseph, Anoob
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] security: suppo... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] security: s... Joseph, Anoob
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] security: s... Akhil Goyal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: add sampl... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] security: support for p... Akhil Goyal
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] security: support f... Thomas Monjalon
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] security: suppo... Hemant Agrawal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/3] security: support for pdcp Hemant Agrawal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: suppo... Hemant Agrawal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] security: support pdcp ... Hemant Agrawal
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] crypto/dpaa2_sec: add s... Hemant Agrawal