> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 12:39 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>; Mordechay
> Haimovsky <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon
> <[email protected]>; Singh, Jasvinder <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Iremonger, Bernard <[email protected]>;
> Pattan, Reshma <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Van
> Haaren, Harry <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd exit using ctrl+d
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dumitrescu, Cristian
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 10:36 AM
> > To: Ananyev, Konstantin <[email protected]>; Mordechay
> Haimovsky <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon
> > <[email protected]>; Singh, Jasvinder <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]; Iremonger, Bernard <[email protected]>;
> Pattan, Reshma <[email protected]>;
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd exit using ctrl+d
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 10:04 AM
> > > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>; Mordechay
> > > Haimovsky <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon
> > > <[email protected]>; Singh, Jasvinder <[email protected]>
> > > Cc: [email protected]; Iremonger, Bernard <[email protected]>;
> > > Pattan, Reshma <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd exit using
> ctrl+d
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dumitrescu,
> > > Cristian
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 5:59 PM
> > > > To: Mordechay Haimovsky <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon
> > > <[email protected]>; Singh, Jasvinder
> > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: [email protected]; Iremonger, Bernard
> <[email protected]>;
> > > Pattan, Reshma <[email protected]>;
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd exit using
> ctrl+d
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Mordechay Haimovsky [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 3:37 PM
> > > > > To: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>; Singh, Jasvinder
> > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: [email protected]; Iremonger, Bernard
> <[email protected]>;
> > > > > Pattan, Reshma <[email protected]>;
> [email protected];
> > > > > Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>
> > > > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd exit using
> > > ctrl+d
> > > > >
> > > > > Even after this fix we still have setups that use netvsc for example,
> on
> > > > > which testpmd exits with rte_panic right after loading it even
> without
> > > > > touching the KBD.
> > > > >
> > > > > I recommend returning the previous prompt routine in test-
> > > pmd/cmdline.c
> > > > > and rework the SOFTNIC section there, preferably moving its poll
> section
> > > to
> > > > > use rte_service in a separate file cleaning the CLI files from PMD-
> specific
> > > > > implementation.
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 3:34 PM
> > > > > > To: Jasvinder Singh <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> > > > > > [email protected]; Mordechay Haimovsky
> > > > > <[email protected]>;
> > > > > > [email protected]; [email protected]
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix testpmd exit
> using
> > > ctrl+d
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Important note:
> > > > > > testpmd is currently really broken.
> > > > > > We cannot have a RC2 until it is fixed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 24/07/2018 13:25, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > > > > 23/07/2018 12:44, Jasvinder Singh:
> > > > > > > > Fix testpmd app exit by pressing ctrl+d, End-of-Transmission
> > > > > > > > character (EOT) on the empty command line.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please describe what is the issue and what is the cause.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Fixes: 0ad778b398c6 ("app/testpmd: rework softnic forward
> > > mode")
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Reported-by: Mordechay Haimovsky <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jasvinder Singh <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > app/test-pmd/cmdline.c | 10 ++++++----
> > > > > > > > lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline.c | 2 +-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It is very suspicious to change the cmdline library.
> > > > > > > If there is a bug in this library, it deserves a separate fix.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > First, testpmd is not really broken, as only thing that changed is the
> > > > Ctrl
> +
> > > D behavior. I agree this is an issue that we need to fix, as
> > > > it looks that it is breaking some automation scripts for some people.
> > > >
> > > > The change in behavior for Ctrl + D exit is caused by replacing the call
> to
> > > cmdline_interact() with calling cmdline_poll() in a loop.
> > > > These two approaches should be identical in behavior, but it looks like
> they
> > > are not due to some issue in the cmdline library.
> > > > Jasvinder proposed a quick patch, but it looks like something else needs
> to
> > > be fixed in cmdline library in order to bring
> > > > cmdline_poll() on parity with cmdline_interact(). Any advice from
> Olivier
> > > would be very much appreciated!
> > > >
> > > > It is really a bad practice to use cmdline_interact() in testpmd, as it
> > > > is a
> > > blocking call that prohibits doing other things on the same
> > > > thread that runs the CLI. Sometimes we need to run other things on the
> > > same core, e.g. the slow softnic_manage() function.
> > >
> > > Curious why not use a service core for softnic background stuff, and leave
> CLI
> > > one for CLI?
> > > Konstantin
> >
> > I guess for a test application you can do anything you want, but in real
> > life
> CPU cores are really expensive and dedicating a CPU core
> > just for CLI is a colossal waste.
>
> Ok, but let's application developer to decide how to use (waste) the cores he
> owns :)
> What I am saying: there is a special thing (developed by Harry) service cores.
> As I understand why of it's the purpose - allow PMD(s) to allocate CPU
> resources for
> there background tasks in a unified and transparent way.
> From the description above - that seems to fit your needs (softnic
> background processing), no?
> Konstantin
>
Then why not put the testpmd CLI itself on a service core? Are you volunteering
for a patch on this? :)
> >
> > We did use the non-blocking cmdline_poll() function instead of the
> blocking cmdline_interact() in the past without any issues. The
> > issues reported by Moti come as a surprise. It is probably good to see what
> this is about and see if we can quickly fix the issue in
> > cmdline library. Otherwise, we can revert the usage of cmdline_poll() with
> cmdline_interact().
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Worst case scenario: We can revert the cmdline_poll() back to
> > > cmdline_interact(), this is a small change, but not the proper way of
> > > > doing things, as this is simply hiding the issue in cmdline library. It
> would
> > > also prevent us from testing some Soft NIC functionality.
