Hi Stephen,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 10:36 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] examples/l3fwd: use reserved IPv4/IPv6
> addresses
>
> The example should use the IPv4 addresses defined in RFC5735 and the IPv6
> addresses defined in RFC5180 for the L3 forwarding example Longest Prefix
> Match table.
>
> Fixes: 268888b5b020 ("examples/l3fwd: modularize")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> ---
<snip>
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
>
> +/* 2001:0200::/48 is IANA reserved address range for IPv6 benchmarking
> +(RFC5180) */
> static struct ipv6_l3fwd_lpm_route ipv6_l3fwd_lpm_route_array[] = {
> - {{1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 0},
> - {{2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 1},
> - {{3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 2},
> - {{4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 3},
> - {{5, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 4},
> - {{6, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 5},
> - {{7, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 6},
> - {{8, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1}, 48, 7},
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 64, 0},
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 64, 0},
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 64, 0},
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 64, 0},
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 64, 0},
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 64, 0},
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 64, 0},
Should the depth value of 48 be used instead of 64 in the lines above?
> + {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 0},
Should 20 be used instead of 32 in the lines above ?
> };
>
> #define IPV4_L3FWD_LPM_NUM_ROUTES \
> --
> 2.17.1
