Hi Stephen,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 10:36 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] testpmd: add ability to set tx IP and UDP
> parameters
> 
> Use RFC standard values for Tx only test as defaults.
> But let the user override those values on command line.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> ---

<snip>

>  app/test-pmd/parameters.c             | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
> b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
> index f301c2b6f709..ae9eb712e209 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst
> @@ -249,6 +249,15 @@ The commandline options are:
>      Set the MAC address ``XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX`` of the peer port N,
>      where 0 <= N < ``CONFIG_RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS`` from the configuration file.
> 
> +
> +*   ``--tx-ip=SRC,DST``

A newline should be inserted after the above line to maintain the existing 
format of the output HTML file.

> +    Set the source and destination IP address used when doing transmit only 
> test.
> +    The defaults are source 192.18.0.1 and destination 192.18.0.2.
> +
> +*   ``--tx-udp=SRC[,DST]``

A newline should be inserted after the above line to maintain the existing 
format of the output HTML file.

> +    Set the source and destination UDP port number for transmit test only 
> test.
> +    The default port is the 9 (discard).
> +
>  *   ``--pkt-filter-mode=mode``
> 
>      Set Flow Director mode where mode is either ``none`` (the default),
> ``signature`` or ``perfect``.
> --
> 2.17.1

dpdk/devtools/check-git-log.sh -1
Wrong headline label:
        testpmd: add ability to set tx IP and UDP parameters
Wrong headline lowercase:
        testpmd: add ability to set tx IP and UDP parameters

The headline label should be "app/testpmd:"
"tx" should "Tx"

I commented on this previously.

Regards,

Bernard.


Reply via email to