HI John,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kovacevic, Marko [mailto:marko.kovace...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 9:00 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; Hemant Agrawal 
> <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John <john.mcnam...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] doc: add SPDX Licence to doc files
> 
> >
> >
> > It has been recommended to add SPDX tags to release notes, with a 
> > global copyright on behalf of all contributors, or community.
> >
> > We need a v2 of this patch, thanks.
> >
> >
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> What exactly is the global copyright ?
> 
> [Hemant] We discussed with LF foundation lawyers. It was suggested to 
> use "Copyright 2018 The DPDK Community"


Hi Hemant,

Is that valid? "The DPDK Community" isn't a single, clear entity.

If that is what has been agreed then we are okay with it but I wanted to make 
100% sure.

[Hemant] I got following recommendation from the Linux Foundation legal:
"For files that are e.g. release scripts and documentation, these are typically 
understood to consist of contributions that are copyrighted by their 
contributors. So even if there isn't a notice in the file, it would still 
generally be understood to be subject to its contributors' copyrights and to be 
licensed out under an open source license.

As you suggested, adding copyright and license notices can help clarify these 
specifics for downstream uses. We have recommended as best practices that 
projects add something like "Copyright The _________ Project" or "Copyright The 
__________ contributors". I think your suggestion of "Copyright The DPDK 
Community" is fine. And yes, I'd recommend including the appropriate license 
notice and/or SPDX identifier in these files as well.
Just to be clear, also, we _don't_ recommend removing pre-existing copyright 
notices unless you are the copyright holder in question. It's generally 
understood that it's fine to add general copyright notices where accurate, but 
only the copyright holder should remove or modify their own notices. "

[Hemant] So, "The DPDK Project" or "The DPDK contributors" or "The DPDK 
community" - anything is fine, we have to use just one of these consistently. 

Regards,
Hemant


Reply via email to