10/04/2018 06:38, Hemant Agrawal: > On 4/9/2018 7:24 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > On 4/9/2018 2:11 PM, Marko Kovacevic wrote: > >> Added SPDX headers to doc files to have them aligned with > >> the other doc files. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovace...@intel.com> > > > > <...> > > > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_07.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_02.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_05.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_08.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_17_11.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_18_02.rst | 3 +++ > >> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_2.rst | 3 +++ > > > > Hi Hemant, > > > > What does it mean to have a license header in release notes? > > It looks unnecessary from both license and copyright point of view, is > > there a > > legal requirement for it? > > > > Indeed I was thinking removing the header from the release notes that has > > it... > > LF legal reported it as missing license. All other *.rst files have the > license headers. > > Let me check it with LF Legal.
It has been recommended to add SPDX tags to release notes, with a global copyright on behalf of all contributors, or community. We need a v2 of this patch, thanks.
