With 5 +1 binding votes (Adrian is a PMC member so his vote is also binding) and 1 +0 vote from Xuanwo, the release is approved.
The release is available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/datafusion/datafusion-sqlparser-rs-0.63.0 I have also released it to crates.io: https://crates.io/crates/sqlparser Thank you to everyone who helped contribute and review the release Andrew On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 3:28 PM Xuanwo <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure, I agree that it’s a waste of time for another round of voting. > > I would change my vote into +0 non-binding. We can fix them in the next > release. > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026, at 03:17, Andrew Lamb wrote: > > Thank you Xuanwo -- I have filed an issue for this [1] as well as PRs > > to fix it [2][3]. > > > > Both of these are long standing issues, from what I can tell the > > sqlparser-rs repository never had a NOTICE file and the flamegraph.svg > > has been present in archives for 2 years -- these are not regressions > > in my ind > > > > Thus, I would like to request you change your vote to +1 for this RC to > > avoid having to restart the 3 day voting period. However, if you feel > > strongly, I will make another RC for consideration > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/2495 > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/2496 > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/2497 > > > > On 2026/09/10 17:20:13 Xuanwo wrote: > >> -1 (non-binding) > >> > >> Thanks Andrew for preparing the release. > >> > >> I found two licensing-material issues in the source archive: > >> > >> 1. The archive has LICENSE.TXT but no NOTICE file. > >> 2. sqlparser_bench/img/flamegraph.svg embeds JavaScript from > >> Inferno, whose upstream license is CDDL 1.0. The archive > >> contains no corresponding license materials. > >> > >> I suggest excluding the generated flamegraph.svg from the > >> source release, and adding the missing NOTICE file before > >> cutting a new RC. > >> > >> Otherwise, SHA-256, SHA-512, the signature, and the complete > >> source comparison against v0.63.0-rc1 passed. On Linux x86_64, > >> the source build and all-features tests passed: 1,614 passed, > >> 0 failed, and 7 ignored. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Xuanwo > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- > Xuanwo > > https://xuanwo.io/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
