>From a user expectation standpoint, example programs should work (e.g., access external dependencies).
Perhaps the interopfest project should not be considered a sample (example) project... and therefore moved out of the binary distribution and into the src distribution only, maybe in it's own folder (i.e, not under the samples folder)? If in the event, that the external dependencies are restored and/or included in the distribution and it makes sense to have the interopfest projects within the samples, they could be moved back. However, to bring this issue to a expedited closure, a more thorough explanation as to the history of the interopfest project(s), as well as including information about the current state and future expectation of these projects in the README.txt file(s) would probably be sufficient, with no other changes necessary. Thanks, Robert -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-how-to-handle-ws-security-interopfest-example-tp4805281p4822033.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
