On 2011-9-16, at 上午12:56, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Colm and I were discussing this a bit yesterday as well. I'm not
really sure
what to do. :-(
One thought I had was that if we could somehow get the wsdl's (any Mac
TimeMachine users that may have them from a previous build or
something?) I
could throw them up on my personal server for now. Reconfigure the
examples
to then just use the local server. That would work for WS-Sec, and
WS-SC
tests, but not the Trust due to the need for the MS STS. With Colm's
proposal this morning, we could have an STS as well.
Thanks Dan for this kind suggestion.
But put the wsdl in a personal server still make cxf example rely on
some outside servers, though I believe your server must be more stable
than the MS one :-), I prefer that cxf examples can run standalone.
That said, the above is a bit of work and I'm not sure how worth it
that would
be at this point. If we're going to to all that work, it's probably
just
better to create a couple new "simpler" samples that show the
various security
options. For example, if we pull in the STS, a good example that
uses that to
show using SAML to secure a service or similar might be a bit more
useful than
the interopfest things that just test a bunch of policies.
I like the idea that create a couple new "simpler" samples that show
the various security options, as cxf could have a better STS as well
soon.
How about we exclude ws_security/interopfest example from kit for now
and we can add more useful security related examples later on.
Regards
Freeman
Dan
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:18:56 AM Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi Team,
Due to the Microsoft WCF security related server down for quite a
while(probably over a year and I'm not sure if they can come back
again), so the ws_security/interopfest examples shipped with kit
doesn't work, I know that wssec10, wssec11, and wssc samples in
samples/ws_security/interopfest have local server, but those local
server also need download wsdl(I don't think we can ship those wsdls
for license reason) during runtime from Microsoft WCF server, so if
Microsoft WCF server is down, even local server doesn't work.
Currently we have a NOTES like
IMPORTANT NOTE: since these samples rely on the external services
that are provided
by Microsoft, they may or may not run or even build reliably if the
services are down
or have been changed.
But if Microsoft WCF server never come back, it means those examples
will never work again, so it's not a good experience for end user.
Should we contact Microsoft to ask the server back(:-))? Should we
remove those examples? Or should we just leave it as is?
Any feedback is appreciated.
Best Regards
Freeman
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ff...@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
