Alternatively, in CXF, users can just write a JAX-WS or JAX-RS endpoint and
have the runtime taking care of delivering AMQP messages and in case of
JAX-RS use the JMS properties for deciding how/where to route a given
message.

Seems to be a better option to me.

Cheers, Sergey

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:18 PM, James Carr <james.r.c...@gmail.com> wrote:

> AMQP as the protocol rather than propietary JMS. I'd prefer JSON as
> the format, but XML works too. The important thing on my part is that
> in java/python/nodejs land I should't care whatsoever on the format
> all I care about is that I called a method on a proxied interface in
> java and "magically" got the same object in my python or nodejs apps
> bound to the same AMQP broker. :)
>
> Last night I actually did some hacks at transforming JAXRS311
> annotations to bind to AMQP queues/exchanges and use @Paths as routing
> keys, buit we'll see how it goes.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Bill Burke <bbu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > you mean using AMQP as a marshalling format?
> >
> > On 2/28/11 10:29 AM, James Carr wrote:
> >>
> >> Even more important... REST over AMQP will be the superior choice in
> >> the future imho. Small messages shared between java and non java
> >> consumers. FTW! :)
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Bill Burke<bbu...@redhat.com>  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2/28/11 6:10 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm starting a new thread...
> >>>>
> >>>> Comments inline.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think its fair to suggest to somebody asking about JMS integration
> >>>>> solutions other than CXF.  We encourage such posts on resteasy mail
> >>>>> list.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Especially since hornetq rest can be consumed by CXF.
> >>>
> >>>> Sure - unless we reckon we can provide something meaningful at the CXF
> >>>> level ?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> FYI, I've tried very very hard to minimalize, lessen, remove the
> >>> requirement
> >>> or need for a specific client framework or stack other than HTTP to
> >>> consume
> >>> hornetq's REST interface.  IMO, anybody writing a REST interface should
> >>> make
> >>> similar efforts.  Because, otherwise, what's the point?
> >>>
> >>> I also think we have to be very very careful from a REST framework
> >>> perspective to avoid marrying/coupling our frameworks to a developer's
> >>> application.  Once you've created the requirement for a framework to be
> >>> installed both on the client and server, you've done something wrong.
> >>>
> >>> All this is why I piped in when somebody asked about JMS integration.
> >>> Because I believe really strongly about the above.  SOAP+JMS is really
> a
> >>> consideration only for cross-language/platform interoperability.  REST,
> >>> IMO,
> >>> is a superior approach because of the reasons listed above.  Since CXF
> is
> >>> now embracing REST through its JAX-RS implementation, alternatives to
> >>> SOAP-based approaches should be suggested and encouraged, at least by
> the
> >>> REST guys at CXF ;)
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> P.S. Bill - you are welcome to contribute and challenge us on the dev
> >>>> list. Sorry if the previous thread caused you some grief :-). I
> >>>> believe no-one meant anything more than just a protective remark. It
> >>>> is obvious now it turned out to be a highly controversial one but hope
> >>>> such a seasoned professional as you are can accept the attempted
> >>>> clarifications and apologies which followed :-)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> My "grief" usually doesn't last more than 2 seconds and I've received
> >>> much
> >>> much worse grief before.  If I was more professional, and I'm not, I
> >>> would
> >>> have just ignored Glen's comments.  Instead, I just couldn't resist the
> >>> urge
> >>> to tweak him, for that I apologize.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Bill Burke
> >>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> >>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >>>
> >
> > --
> > Bill Burke
> > JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> > http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >
>



-- 
Sergey Beryozkin

Application Integration Division of Talend <http://www.talend.com>
http://sberyozkin.blogspot.com

Reply via email to